<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Benchmarks on Aillex — Do-It-Yourself AI</title>
    <link>https://askaillex.com/tags/benchmarks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Benchmarks on Aillex — Do-It-Yourself AI</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://askaillex.com/tags/benchmarks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Open Models Are 4.4 Months Behind the Frontier. That Is Not Your Gap.</title>
      <link>https://askaillex.com/articles/radar-four-months-is-not-your-gap/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://askaillex.com/articles/radar-four-months-is-not-your-gap/</guid>
      <description>A Mozilla analysis put the open to closed capability gap at about 4.4 months, and it went round the local AI world as good news. It is good news. It is also being read as something it does not say, because the open model doing the catching up is 2.78 trillion parameters and will never see the inside of your computer.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
